Non-native plants were generally sparse and subordinate in abundance to native species in both untreated forest and after cutting and prescribed fire, but long-term Ceritinib mw monitoring and precautionary non-native plant control warrant consideration if maintaining this status quo is a management goal. Based on our review of existing literature, further research needs include: (i) assessing effects of specific components of treatment operations (e.g., cutting intensity and residual spatial arrangements of trees, methods of slash treatment, grazing management) and their interaction on understory trajectories; (ii)

comparing responses in moist versus dry mixed conifer forest; (iii) evaluating long-term NLG919 ic50 similarities and differences between tree cutting and prescribed fire regimes and their combination; (iv) further identifying groups of native species benefiting from treatments or sensitive to treatment alternatives; (v) determining feasibility of forecasting treatment effects based on the initial plant community including seed bank composition; and (vi) more thoroughly understanding

influences of wildfires. For operational monitoring of projects, early monitoring is important to detect an initial surge in disturbance-promoted species (both native and non-native). However, the delayed increase in total understory plant cover and richness indicated that monitoring for at least 4 years after treatment is necessary to accurately appraise longer term trajectories of post-treatment understories.

Monitoring both total understory measures and management-priority groups of species (e.g., fire-stimulated flora, or shrubs for browse) is useful for identifying whether further management (e.g., non-native species control) can provide competitive advantages to desired species Urocanase groups. We conclude that native understory species, even if temporarily reduced in abundance, persist through tree cutting and prescribed fire and have benefited from these treatments after 5 years post-treatment, as long as forest overstories remain open. This review was funded by the Ecological Restoration Institute (ERI) through an agreement (organized by Wally Covington, Diane Vosick, and Kathleen Mitchell of the ERI) to Natural Resource Conservation LLC. We thank Meg Eastwood and Mary Dejong, librarians at Cline Library (Northern Arizona University) for help in performing batch systematic searching; authors of papers who responded to our inquiries regarding photos of study sites and supplemental information about their findings (Appendix B); Joe Crouse for developing the base map for Fig.