36) and in fact, the combination was generally less effective or at best no more effective than either treatment alone. These results are supported by those of another recent study that found no additive benefit of combining
manual therapy (involving 6 to 8 sessions over an 8-week period with up to 5 nonmanipulative lower grade mobilisation techniques per session) with exercise, except for patients’ satisfaction with their clinical outcome (French et al 2013). It has been postulated that those in the combined therapy group might spend less time on each intervention than do those who receive only one intervention, which subsequently decreases the effectiveness of both modalities (Abbott et al 2013). While manual therapy appears to be beneficial, there may be specific subgroups of people with hip osteoarthritis who respond best to the intervention.
Post hoc evaluation of the Hoeksma (2004) trial showed that the response to manual therapy was not INK1197 cell line influenced by baseline levels of hip function, pain, and range of motion. However, participants with mild or moderate hip osteoarthritis assessede radiographically had better range of motion outcomes with manual therapy than did those with severe osteoarthritis. From a clinical perspective, a range of manual therapy techniques can be used to treat people with hip osteoarthritis. These include soft tissue techniques and stretches, mobilisation Selleckchem Proteasome inhibitor of accessory and physiological movements and manipulation. In addition, given the close link between the hip, lumbar spine, and sacroiliac joints, as well as the kinetic link with more peripheral joints, manual therapy to these other joints is often applied to people with hip osteoarthritis (Abbott et al 2013). However, a chiropractic study in people with mild to moderate hip osteoarthritis found no difference comparing a treatment regimen (9 treatments over a 5-week period) involving full kinetic chain manual and manipulative therapy plus exercise to that of one involving targeted hip manual and
manipulative therapy plus exercise (Brantingham et al 2012). While there have been no reports of serious adverse events associated with the use of manual therapy in patients with hip osteoarthritis, Linifanib (ABT-869) therapists should advise patients about the possibility of self-limiting posttreatment soreness. While there are no clinical trials, interventions that reduce adverse mechanical forces across a compromised hip joint have face validity (Zhang et al 2005). The patient should be given appropriate joint protection advice guided by their aggravating factors and functional problems. The main advice is to avoid prolonged postures and activities that overload the joint. During walking and stair ascent/descent, the hip joint is subjected to considerable loading with data from instrumented hip prostheses revealing hip loads of approximately 250% of body weight (Bergmann et al 2001).