Cronbach’s coefficients were good (0.70-0.97) for all scales except environment. Correlations between the areas of the QLQ-C30 and OUT-PATSAT35 RT were generally low (<0.40).

Correlations

between the OS and the IR were moderate with the EORTC OUT-PATSAT35 RT. Areas whose contents were more related had higher correlation coefficients (>0.50), and vice versa (<0.20).

Patients with higher scores on the OS and the IR, patients who had more visits to the doctor and patients who had a better performance status showed higher SC Belnacasan manufacturer levels in 12, 8 and 1 OUT-PATSAT35 RT areas, respectively.

Conclusions: The OUT-PATSAT35 RT appears to be a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish cancer patients. These results are in line with those of the validation study conducted by the authors of the questionnaire. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.”
“Objective. The criterion commonly used to determine whether radiofrequency neurotomy may be recommended is based on patient-reported, short-term pain relief following

facet block injections. This study evaluated the concordance between two commonly used outcomes for pain relief: the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and the global perceived improvement (GPI) scale. Design. This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods. Data were obtained from a consecutive cohort of GSK690693 ic50 patients through a review of the electronic medical records, with the following inclusion criteria: medial branch facet blocks at either cervical or lumbar spinal regions. Outcome Measures. Pain NRS (baseline, postprocedure, and hourly up to 6 hours) and GPI scale are expressed as

percent improvement at 6 hours, relative to baseline. Results. The percent improvement in pain NRS corresponded to 49%, 43%, 34%, 21%, and 36% for baseline vs immediately post-block, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours and average of all postscores, respectively. Average GPI reported at 6 hours was 44%, and differed significantly only to the baseline vs 6 hours percent improvement on the NRS (P < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis indicated that there were no demographic or baseline factors that accounted for the discrepancy between GPI vs NRS. Conclusions. Asking patients selleck compound about their pain relief in retrospect can be misleading. It is possible that patients’ report on the GPI is weighed by their total experience of pain reduction and retrospective recall. Therefore, when choosing to address percent improvement on NRS measures, it is important to take into account multiple instances of NRS measures following treatment.”
“Objective: The NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) was administered to 143 women undergoing chemotherapy for gynecologic cancer over a two-year period. This report describes the frequency and character of psychological distress in this population and examines the effect of disease, treatment, and demographic variables on levels of distress.