” Green indicated a strongly held preference that was “mostly or completely satisfied.” This sample of NH residents showed wide variability this website in the number of important preferences and the extent to which they considered their care to be preference congruent. Findings from phase 1 demonstrated that cognitively capable NH residents and those with

mild cognitive impairment could report personal preferences and satisfaction with their fulfillment. In addition, a preference congruence score was calculated via an easily interpreted Excel report for NH staff. The next phase of the process entailed the adoption and scaling-up of this process by the Advancing Excellence Collaborative. The Advancing Excellence in America’s Nursing Homes Campaign was formed in 2006 to promote clinical and organizational excellence for the residents, families and staff of NHs.19 The campaign includes

a wide range of stakeholders including providers, consumers, advocates, ombudsmen, practitioners, government agencies, and quality improvement (QI) organizations. To date, 9,545 (61%) of the nation’s NHs homes have signed on to pursue 1 or more goals designated by the Campaign to strengthen PARP inhibitors clinical trials NH quality. In 2012, the Campaign revised and expanded potential goals to include a total of 9 clinical and process goals, including the PCC goal. At this time, AE convened a workgroup (Appendix) to develop a measurement strategy and toolkit of resources to support Enzalutamide NHs pursuing a data-driven QI project focusing on PCC. The workgroup chose outcome measures to capture both resident-centered decision-making processes and resident-centered care planning processes. The workgroup identified PRI’s PELI, and the associated preference congruence indicator,

as an evidence-based approach to measuring resident involvement in making decisions about, and provisions, for their care. Although the original PELI research measure focuses on 55 preferences, the AE PCC narrowed the focus to 16 personal care and recreational activity items from the MDS 3.0–Section F (Figure 1). The decision to use the 16 MDS 3.0 items was made with an eye toward minimizing the burden of additional data collection, as NH staff are already familiar with these items and assess them on a regular basis. A modification to the response options was also needed because the MDS 3.0 section F items use a 5-point scale of importance instead of the 3-point scale of more colloquial “likes.” Finally, in addition to the previous color coding system for reporting preference congruence levels (eg, green, yellow, red), grey was added to indicate that the resident had used the response category “important, but can’t do,” which requires staff, per regulation, to create a care plan.