Materials and methods: Ten pencil beam lung plans were recalculat

Materials and methods: Ten pencil beam lung plans were recalculated using the collapsed cone algorithm.

Then, beam weights were optimised on the recalculated collapsed cone plan, without altering field sizes. Finally, both field sizes and beam weights were optimised on the same plan in an attempt to deliver a minimum of either 90 or 95% of the prescribed dose to the planning target volume. Thus, four sets of plans were available for comparison.

Results: Compared with pencil beam plans recalculated with the collapsed cone algorithm, all collapsed Repotrectinib purchase cone plans had improved dose coverage of the planning target volume. For two of the

beam weight optimised plans, less than 80% of the planning target volume received 90% of the prescribed dose. For the field size, beam weight optimised plans, nearly 100% of the planning target volume attained 90% of the prescribed dose, with the clinical target volume generally reaching 95%. Compared with the original pencil beam plans, the volume of lung receiving greater than 20 Gy (V(20)) increased by 3.1 and 6.8%, respectively, for those plans optimised find protocol to deliver a minimum of 90 or 95% of the prescribed dose to the planning target volume.

Conclusions: We suggest that the collapsed cone algorithm might reasonably be implemented for conventional radiotherapy treatment planning with the aim of delivering Metabolism inhibitor a minimum of 90% of the prescribed dose to the planning target volume and 95% of the prescribed dose to the clinical target volume. This guidance offers consistent prescription of dose to target volumes. Pearson, M. et

al. (2009). Clinical Oncology 21, 168-174 (C) 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Pubtished by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Background: Recent years have seen a trend toward more operative treatment of upper extremity fractures in children. The current study examines clinical research regarding pediatric upper extremity fracture treatment over the past twenty years in an attempt to identify research-based support for the increasingly aggressive treatment of these fractures.

Methods: Accepted abstracts on pediatric upper extremity fracture treatment presented at the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) annual meetings from 1993 through 2012 were reviewed. Abstracts were chosen rather than publications because of the larger number of abstracts that are available and because abstracts offer a more global representation of the research being performed by and presented to the members of these societies.

Comments are closed.