The volume of CSF sample is very important to achieve good PCR results, and the difficulty in collecting an adequate volume of CSF sample makes diagnosis of TB meningitis a daunting challenge in the paediatric

subjects (Kulkarni et al., 2005; Galimi, 2011). Kulkarni et al. (2005) selleck chemicals documented a sensitive PCR test targeting 38 kDa protein gene using small volume of whole CSF for the diagnosis of TB meningitis in children. Their test could detect 10 femtogram (fg) of DNA and that is equivalent to 2–3 tubercle bacilli. Rafi et al. (2007) used ‘whole’ CSF instead of using the ‘sediment’ for their PCR assay, thus proving that the M. tuberculosis DNA could be present as free DNA molecules in CSF samples. The utility of CSF ‘filtrate’ for detecting M. tuberculosis

DNA by conventional PCR targeting IS6110 and devR genes as well as by real-time PCR targeting devR has been demonstrated by Haldar et al. (2009). Interestingly, it was found that CSF ‘filtrate’ exhibited better sensitivity and specificity than the ‘sediment’ by both assays. Takahashi & Nakayama (2006) designed a quantitative nested real-time PCR (QNRT-PCR) assay targeting MPB-64 protein gene to detect M. tuberculosis DNA in CSF samples, and their method was extremely useful for assessing the clinical course of patients with TB meningitis on ATT (Takahashi et al., 2008). To detect M. tuberculosis DNA in CSF samples with a wide detection range (1–105 Fluorouracil cost copy

numbers) during the clinical course of disease, a novel wide-range quantitative nested real-time PCR (WR-QNRT-PCR) assay targeting MPB-64 protein gene has been meticulously developed (Takahashi et al., 2008). Osteoarticular TB accounts for about 1–3% of all TB cases and is the major cause of osteomyelitis (Yun et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2011). Any bone, joint or bursa can be infected but the spine, hip and knee are the preferred sites of infection, representing 70–80% of the infections (Pandey et al., 2009). TB of the spine which if not diagnosed properly and treated adequately may develop kyphosis and/or neurological complication (paraplegia; Jain et al., 2008). The accurate diagnosis of osteoarticular ALOX15 TB poses difficulty owing to deep inaccessible lesions and initiation of empirical ATT in majority of the cases (Vardhan & Yanamandra, 2011). Mostly, the diagnosis of osteoarticular TB is based on clinical suspicion and imaging findings, particularly in the endemic regions (Agashe et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2011). PCR tests based on IS6110, 16S rRNA gene and 65 kDa protein gene targets have been widely employed to confirm osteoarticular TB with varying sensitivities (Verettas et al., 2003; Negi et al., 2005b; Jain et al., 2008; Agashe et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2011; Table 1).