We proposed a model for the acquired resistance to erlotinib in this group (Fig. 5). Even in usual culture condition without erlotinib, HCC827 parent cells maintain EGFR-unamplified cells by a constant fraction. These cells were generated by the loss

of an EGFR-ampch7 in EGFR-amplified cells. The levels of expression and phosphorylation of EGFR in EGFR-unamplified cells, such as clone 4D8 and resistant cell Fulvestrant supplier B10, were drastically decreased compared with the parent cells, whereas the downstream AKT/ERK phosphorylation was not decreased (Supplementary Fig. 3). When exposed to relatively low concentrations of erlotinib (0.1 and 1 μM), the resistant cells, namely, the pre-existing EGFR-unamplified cells survived and proliferated in the parent cell population ( Fig. 5). Whether this phenomenon can be found in other cell lines is of interest. We found that EGFR exon 19 deleted NSCLC cell line B901L has two EGFR-ampch7

and has pre-existing EGFR-unamplified cells (about 0.2%) under normal culture conditions (Supplementary Fig. 4). Although the mechanism associated with the loss of an EGFR-ampch7 with exon 19 deletion in EGFR-amplified cells under normal culture conditions is unclear, the mutation of EGFR and multiple centromeres in EGFR-ampch7 may cause genetic instability. Copy number gains and mutant allele-specific imbalances Selleckchem IDH inhibitor such as amplification, polysomy, or uniparental disomy, occur frequently in tumor cells with EGFR mutations [19]. In fission yeast, abnormal centromere function results in a highly elevated rate of chromosome loss and chromosome missegregation [20]. Furthermore, the proportion of EGFR-unamplified cells in the parent cell population was unchanged for 9 months under normal cell culture conditions (2.5% at the start and 2.1% after 9 months; data not shown). These findings indicate that the abnormality of the EGFR-ampch7 may lead to uneven distribution of the chromosome during mitosis not frequently but constantly. Although we did not identify Amobarbital the novel addicted oncogene in EGFR-unamplified

resistant cells (4D8, B10 or D11), wild-type EGFR may be a candidate because the proliferation of these cells was still inhibited by more than approximately 1 μM of erlotinib (Supplementary Fig. 5A). In addition, the erlotinib of corresponding concentration completely blocks the phosphorylation of wild-type EGFR [21]. Furthermore, the IC50 value of irreversible EGFR-TKI, afatinib, to 4D8 and D11 cells was approximately 25-fold higher than that of the parent cells (Supplementary Fig. 5B). In addition, EGFR knockdown by siRNA partially but significantly inhibited cell proliferation in all of three resistant cells (Supplementary Fig. 5 C). These results indicate that EGFR-unamplified resistant cells could favorably change the addiction from delE746-A750 EGFR to the other growth drivers including wild-type EGFR even in the presence of one or two copies of delE746-A750 EGFR.