Crude product was triturated with cold petroleum ether; solid obt

Yield of the product was 20.0 g (80.6%) as white solid. M. pt: 103.4–104.8 °C. Mol. Wt: 257.23, LCMS: 258.1(M+1). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz); δ 8.12(m, 1H), 7.86(m, 2H), 7.47(m, 3H), 6.97(m, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 170.42, 165.6, 162.77, 15752, 130.26, 128.11, 127.22, 125.78, 112.3, 104.9, 99.61. To the solution of 3-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-5-phenylisoxazole (20.0 g, 77.82 mmol) in glacial acetic

Selleck Fludarabine acid (200 mL) was added N-bromosuccinimide10 (16.6 g, 93.25 mmol), in one lot at RT and then reaction mass was heated to 100 °C for 16 h. RM was cooled to RT and acetic acid was removed under reduced pressure. The residue obtained was

diluted with ethyl acetate (500 mL), washed with water, saturated brine solution, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure. Crude product was triturated with cold petroleum ether; solid obtained was filtered and dried. Yield of the product was 20.0 g (77%) as white solid. M. pt: 103.4–104.8 °C. Mol. Wt: 336.13, LCMS: 337.9(M+1). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.11(m, 2H), 7.56(m, 4H), 7.04(m, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 165.6, 163.2, 161.82, 159.17, 132.53, 132.24, 130.85, 128.9, 126.9, 126.96, 126.47, 112.01, 104.88, 91.03. To a solution of 4-bromo-3-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-5-phenylisoxazole (0.5 g, 1.488 mmol) in 10 mL of dioxane was added corresponding arylboronicacid11 (2.232 mmol), Selleckchem PLX3397 Pd (PPh3)4 (0.0744 mmol), potassium carbonate (2.232 mmol), and water (1 mL). The RM was then heated to 100 °C under microwave irradiation for a period of 30 min. After completion of reaction (monitored by TLC) RM was concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure and re-dissolved in Ethyl Acetate, then organic layer washed with brine solution, dried over sodium sulphate and evaporated under reduced pressure. Crude product was purified by Column chromatography using Pet ether:

Ethyl Acetate. Yield: 85% as white powder. M. pt:149.4–150.4 °C. Mol. Wt.: 351.32 for C21H12F3NO, LCMS: 351.9(M+1); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.58(d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.39(m, 4H), 7.17(m, 2H), 7.03(t, J = 8.8 Hz, through 2H), 6.93(t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.83(t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 167.8, 165.9, 164.7, 160.8, 159.7, 158.7, 156.8, 132.9, 132.5, 129.65, 129.05, 129.26, 127.31, 127.24, 124.7, 116.8, 116.9, 113.6, 112.9, 104.8, 101.2. Yield: 82% as white powder. M. pt: 146.2–147.3 °C. Mol. Wt.: 351.32 for C21H12F3NO, LCMS: 352(M+1); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.58(d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.41(m, 4H), 7.27(m, 1H), 7.06(t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.95(m, 3H), 6.82(t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H).

The first year following vaccination, the predicted seroprotectio

The first year following vaccination, the predicted seroprotection rate is high but decreases quite rapidly (−2.3% between day 28 and year 1). The seroprotection rate declines at a slower rate during the second year than during the first (−0.4%) but then accelerates from this point onwards. This can be seen by a steeper curve after year 5. In particular, at year 5 the predicted seroprotection is 94.7% (95% CI: 90.9–97.9) which is comparable

to the observed value of 93.3% (95% CI: 82.1–98.6). At 10 years the predicted seroprotection level still remains high at 85.5% (95% CI: 72.7–94.9). We calculated the percentiles for duration selleck of protection in our study population, or equivalently, the percentage of individuals having at least the given duration of protection DZNeP price by maintaining antibody titres above the accepted threshold. The maximum, median and minimum duration

of protection were calculated to be respectively 38.1 years, 21.3 years and less than 28 days. Excluding the 2 subjects who were not seroprotected at 28 days (vaccine non responders), all subjects had at least 3.4 years of protection and 90% of subjects had at least 11.2 years of protection. Table 3 gives the percentiles for duration of protection in our study population excluding the 2 non-responders. The change point for antibody decay refers to the time when the initial period of rapid decline in titre ends and the second period of slow decline begins. The average individual change point, as estimated by the 2-period piecewise-linear

Cell press model, was 0.267 years (5th to 95th percentile range: 0.11–0.61). This means that antibody titres after a single dose of JE-CV would continue to decline rapidly from their peak value observed around day 28 until 3.2 months after vaccination on average (5th to 95th percentile range: 1.4–7.3). After this initial period of rapid antibody decline, titres continue to decline but at a much slower rate (about 50 times slower). Our analyses of the persistence of antibodies predict that the seroprotection rate after a single dose of JE-CV in adults remains high for at least 10 years. This conclusion is based on a median antibody titre at 10 years of 38, which exceeds the seroprotective threshold of 10 accepted by regulatory authorities as a surrogate marker of protection [9]. Overall, we predicted that 85.5% of subjects will maintain antibody titres above the threshold value 10 years after vaccination. The median duration of seroprotection exceeded 20 years, and 90% of responding subjects had at least 11.2 years of protection. We also inferred from our analyses that there is an early, short period of rapid antibody decline ending during the 4th month after vaccination (3.2 months on average), after which a second period of much slower antibody decay ensues for many years.

Widespread experience with rotavirus vaccines under conditions of

Widespread experience with rotavirus vaccines under conditions of routine use in many countries worldwide coupled GSK2118436 concentration with clinical trial data provide much insight into the performance, impact, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines. The objective of this paper is to review data from international settings to help address key questions regarding anticipated rotavirus vaccine

performance and impact in India. Both internationally licensed rotavirus vaccines, RV1 and RV5, were found to be highly efficacious in clinical trials conducted in the USA, Latin America, Europe, and high income Asian countries (Table 2). RV1 was 85% (95% CI: 71–83%) efficacious in preventing severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (Vesikari score ≥11) among Latin American infants [1]. In subsequent trials examining efficacy during the first

www.selleckchem.com/products/Dasatinib.html two years of life, RV1 was 81% (95% CI: 71–87%) efficacious against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in Latin American children, 90% (95% CI: 85–94%) efficacious in European children, and 96% (95% CI: 85–100%) efficacious in children in high income Asian countries [7], [8] and [9]. Similarly, in clinical trials conducted mainly in the USA and Finland, RV5 was 96% (95% CI: 91–98%) efficacious against hospitalizations due to rotavirus gastroenteritis caused by G1–G4 strains, 94% (95% CI: 89–97%) against emergency department visits, and 86% (95% CI: 74–93%) against office visits [2]. Because live oral vaccines, including earlier candidate rotavirus vaccines, have a history of performing less well in developing countries [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] and [17], WHO specifically recommended that efficacy trials of both RV1 and RV5 be conducted in low income countries of Africa and Asia before issuing a global recommendation for rotavirus vaccine use. Vaccine efficacy was modest in these trials. In Africa (South Africa and Malawi), two doses of RV1 administered at 10 and 14 weeks

of age had 59% (95% CI: 36–74%) efficacy against severe rotavirus diarrhea during the first year of life and three doses at Oxymatrine 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age had 64% (95% CI: 42–78%) efficacy [18]. Efficacy appeared to decline during the second year of life, particularly among 2 dose recipients. In Malawi, efficacy was similar for two and three dose recipients during the first year of life (49% (95% CI: 11–72%) and 50% (95% CI: 11–72%), respectively) [18] and [19]. However, in the second year of life, efficacy disappeared in two dose recipients (3% (95% CI: −101 to 53%)) while declining to 33% (95% CI: −49 to 71%) among three dose recipients [18] and [19]. In South Africa, efficacy was similar in the three dose recipients during the first year of life (82% (95% CI: 55–94%)) and overall during the first two years of life (85% (95% CI: 35–98%)) [18] and [20].

13 Dorgo and colleagues14 showed that the peer-mentoring model ha

13 Dorgo and colleagues14 showed that the peer-mentoring model has the potential to be a cost-effective method of reaching out to older adults, engaging them in physical exercise programs for extended periods and improving their health and fitness. The assistance of professional trainers with extensive experience would be costly, especially in long-term programs with high numbers of participants, while older adult peer mentors assisting on a volunteer basis would significantly reduce program costs. Appropriate activities should be carefully planned before program implementation 5-Fluoracil in vivo to best suit the specific needs of aged individuals.

Good reachability and continuous motivation might also increase participation.15 Thus, a major responsibility of physiotherapists Proteasome inhibitor and other exercise prescribers is to educate people on the importance and value of exercise, as it relates to optimal physical function, wellness and quality of life.16

This review has focused on factors associated with adherence rather than interventions designed to enhance adherence. Therefore, these suggestions about enhancing exercise adherence need further investigation in clinical trials. Future research targeted at older people should be designed to incorporate specific strategies that will enhance the recruitment, adherence and retention of people from diverse cultures and ethnic backgrounds. Future work in this area should also address behavioural motivation, as well as social and environmental contexts, to raise commitment to exercise among the largely sedentary population of older people with their multiple

illnesses and functional deficits.10 and 17 A limitation of this review is that the results of the individual observational studies may have been confounded by the presence of other variables that were associated with both participant characteristics and exercise adherence rates. Social and psychological variables, such as motivation and social support, were not measured in all studies and may explain larger amounts of variance in exercise adherence than the measured variables. Furthermore, the pragmatic decision to limit this review to the last ten years of research Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase may have impacted on the results. Understanding the variables that influence adherence to exercise among older people is very important for clinical physiotherapists because low rates of adherence are likely to limit the benefits obtained from exercise. Exercise adherence in older people is multifactorial, involving demographic, health-related, physical and psychological factors. The range of predictors of exercise adherence underscores the need for health professionals to consider these findings in designing strategies to enhance exercise adherence in this vulnerable population.

In contrast to our findings, they found a preventive

effe

In contrast to our findings, they found a preventive

effect on injury incidence and injury severity (time loss), particularly for non-contact injuries ( Junge et al 2011). It should be noted that their study aimed to evaluate the country-wide implementation of The11, so their design was less rigorous than the design chosen for the present study. The11 was implemented among male and female soccer players of different ages, with different injury patterns. The small sample sizes in their study meant that the Swiss authors were unable to draw conclusions about the effect check details of The11 on specific injuries or differences between different soccer populations. It remains unknown whether there were similar effects of The11 among senior soccer players compared to the other groups of soccer players. Our study had some limitations, particularly in relation to our cost recording method. Healthcare use and productivity losses HSP inhibitor associated with injury were reported on the recovery form, which was completed after the player’s full recovery. This may have led to some

recall bias for injuries with a long and costly rehabilitation period. To minimise recall bias, the paramedical staff was advised to ask players regularly about their healthcare use and productivity loss, especially players with prolonged sports absenteeism. Another limitation was missing cost data because of incomplete recovery forms (missing therapeutic consultations) and some completely missing recovery forms. The few missing therapeutic consultations (6% of the injuries) may be regarded as missing at random, as no differences were found with the complete recovery data. However, the problem of incomplete recovery forms could have been avoided

if the injury registration system had also required the users to fill in the number of therapeutic consultations if more than one care provider had been consulted. We assume that imputation of these incomplete recovery data resulted in a more precise cost estimation of injuries in both groups, and did not affect the outcomes. As regards the completely missing PD184352 (CI-1040) recovery forms (13% of the injuries), missing injury costs were imputed using the average injury costs in each group. However, this strategy can severely distort the distribution of costs, causing the variation in these costs to be underestimated (Donders et al 2006). The outcomes of the sensitivity analysis should therefore be interpreted with some caution. The study was performed from a societal perspective, but we did not include direct non-healthcare costs in this economic evaluation (Hakkaart-van Roijen et al 2011). Direct nonhealthcare costs consist of traveling expenses, cost for patient time or family members’ time, and other costs. Incorporating these costs will increase the average costs per injury, but we do not expect (substantial) differences in these direct non-healthcare costs between both groups.

9 antibodies on a 500-fold dilution in ELISA coating solution at

9 antibodies on a 500-fold dilution in ELISA coating solution at 37 °C for 1 h. The Volasertib plates were washed three times with

PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST) and blocked for 1 h with 3% non-fat milk solution in PBST at 37 °C. After that, a 100 μl solution with mixed vaccine emulsion already diluted in PBST containing various ratios of the denatured and intact antigen were added to wells in triplicate and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing, mAb5.2 (1000-fold dilution in PBS containing 3% milk powder) was added, incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Then it was washed and probed with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (1 h at 37 °C). Finally, the plates were washed, followed by the addition of 100 μl/well of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB)–H2O2 solution (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The reaction was stopped with 50 μl of 2 mol/l H2SO4 per well after 10 min of enzyme–substrate interaction. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm using the Bio-tek ELISA microplate reader. Each set of samples of the mixed emulsion preparations were tested ten times independently for calibration and calculation of the 95% confidence interval. Pre-stored samples were subjected to the same analysis and by comparing the 95% confidence interval of stored samples

with the standard curve we quantitatively determined the extent of antigen degradation over time. An optimal method to extract the antigen from the emulsion was recommended by the Seppic’s Corporation. Briefly, 200 μl of benzyl alcohol OTX015 chemical structure was added to 1 ml of the antigen/adjuvant emulsion. After the mixture was vortexed for 5 min the mixture was Megestrol Acetate transferred to a microcentrifuge tube

and centrifuged at 2500 × g for 20 min and the middle aqueous layer aspirated from the three-phase system and analyzed immediately or stored at −20 °C until analyzed. Protein extracted from the emulsions were subjected to reducing or non-reducing 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by Coomassie blue and silver staining as a measure of PfCP-2.9 integrity. For the Western blot analysis, PfCP-2.9 extracts were electrophonetically transferred onto nitrocellulose paper (Pall Corporation, New York, NY) and blocked with 5% (w/v) non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.4) for 30 min, washed with TBS 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) and then probed with mAb5.2 diluted at 1: 1000 in 1% milk-TBST for x 1 h. The blots were then washed in PBST and reacted with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 1:1000 dilution (in 1% milk-TBST, then washed as above. Finally the reactivity was visualized by incubating with BCIP/NBT (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The immunogenicity of the vaccine formulation was tested using six groups of BALB/c mice (10 per group).

The results of the current systematic

The results of the current systematic selleck inhibitor review provide stronger evidence of the efficacy of electrical stimulation for increasing strength and improving activity; this is because the conclusions are based on a meta-analysis of nine randomised trials and two controlled trials of reasonable quality. In addition, the trials included in the meta-analysis were similar with regard to the stimulation parameters (frequency and duration of the stimulus) and the amount of intervention

delivered. Although the length of the individual sessions varied (mean 45 min per muscle, SD 38), the trials were very similar in their frequency (mean 4.6/wk, SD 0.7) and duration (mean 5.8 wk, SD 3.0) of intervention. The evidence appears strong enough to recommend that daily sessions of electrical stimulation with high repetitions of maximum muscle contractions be used to increase strength after stroke. The second question examined whether electrical stimulation is more effective than other strengthening interventions for increasing strength after stroke. There are insufficient data to determine whether electrical stimulation is better than another strengthening intervention. Only three trials investigating this question were included and a meta-analysis could not be performed. Furthermore, the mean PEDro score of 4.0 from the three trials related to this question

represents low quality, with considerable performance,

attrition and detection bias present. The third question examined find more the most effective dose or mode of electrical stimulation for increasing strength after stroke. There are insufficient data to provide evidence regarding the effect of different doses/modes of electrical stimulation. Only one trial 25 directly compared two different modes and found no difference between electrical stimulation and EMG-triggered electrical stimulation, with an effect size near zero. This review has both strengths and limitations. The mean PEDro score of 5.0 for the 16 trials included in this review represents moderate quality. A source whatever of bias in the included trials was lack of blinding of therapists and participants, since it is very difficult to blind therapists or participants during the delivery of complex interventions. Other sources of bias were lack of reporting concealed allocation or whether an intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken. On the other hand, the main strength of this review is that only trials where electrical stimulation was applied in order to increase strength and with a clear measure of force generation were included; this makes the results specific to the research questions. Additionally, publication bias inherent to systematic reviews was avoided by including studies published in languages other than English.

Absorption with 30 μg/ml serotype 22F overnight has been reported

Absorption with 30 μg/ml serotype 22F overnight has been reported previously [31] and [32] and unpublished data from our laboratory have shown this to further improve the specificity of the pneumococcal ELISA. The reference serum standard 89-SF (Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda MD) and samples for measurement of specific IgG to serotype 22F were pre-absorbed with C-PS at 10 μg/mL and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-human IgG and a TMB (3.3′, 5.5′-tetramethylbenzidine) substrate solution was used for detection. A high, medium, and low control

serum were used on each plate to assess assay performance and inter-assay variation. Results from an inter-laboratory comparison between the Pneumococcal Laboratory, Murdoch Childrens Trametinib in vitro Research Institute (Melbourne, Talazoparib Australia), Wyeth Vaccine Research Laboratory (USA) and the KTL laboratory (Finland) demonstrated a good correlation of serotype-specific antibody concentrations [33]. Laboratory staff members were blinded to the group allocation of each

serum sample This manuscript reports analytic results concerning the secondary purpose of the trial. Cleaned data were exported to Stata version 9.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas) for analysis. Serotype-specific antibody concentrations by ELISA were log (base e) transformed to calculate Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease GMC. Comparisons of serotype-specific GMC between 0 and 3 dose PCV-7 groups were performed using a two-sample

t-test. Comparisons of serotype-specific GMC before and after the PPV-23 were performed using the paired t test. Comparisons of the proportion of infants between groups with serotype-specific antibody concentrations ≥0.35 and ≥1 μg/mL were performed using Fisher’s exact test. Comparisons of serotype-specific antibody concentrations ≥0.35 and ≥1 μg/mL before and after the PPV-23 were performed using exact McNemar’s test. A p-value of <0.01 was considered statistically significant due to the multiple comparisons. There were 552 infants enrolled in the study (Fig. 1) and the characteristics of the randomized infants have been described elsewhere (15). The 552 participants represent a consent rate of 30.5%, of which 10% had withdrawn by 12 months and 15% by 17 months of age. The commonest reason for withdrawal was relocation outside the study area. No participant was withdrawn due to a reaction to any of the vaccines. The 12-month PPV-23 was administered to 245 children with all groups having blood drawn a median of 14 days (IQR 14–15 days) post booster. Two weeks following the PPV-23, GMC were significantly higher (each p < 0.001) for all PCV-7 serotypes for children that had received either 1, 2, or 3 PCV-7 doses in the primary series compared to levels prior to receiving PPV-23 ( Table 1).

Further R aquatica root also claimed to have diuretic effect 24

Further R. aquatica root also claimed to have diuretic effect 24 and diuretic effects

may also reduce stone development when total fluid intake and output increased, and such effects have been attributed to several herbal preparations. Herbal extracts may contain substances that inhibit the growth of CaOx crystals. This property of plants may be important in preventing kidney stone formation; CaOx crystals induced by urinary macromolecules was less tightly bound to epithelial cell surfaces, which are then excreted with urine.32 The extract may also contain substances that inhibit CaOx crystal aggregation; the agglomeration of particles is a critical step in urinary stone formation, as larger crystals

are less likely to pass spontaneously in the urinary tract.33 If the extract keeps CaOx particles dispersed in solution they are more easily NVP-BGJ398 in vivo eliminated. The aqueous extract of R. aquatica root have inhibitory SCH772984 chemical structure effect on CaOx crystallization thus may be beneficial in the treatment of urolithiasis but there is a need of detailed investigation in elaborated preclinical experimentations and clinical trials to establish the use of plant as antiurolithiatic agent. All authors have none to declare. The authors are very grateful to the University Grants Commission New Delhi (UGC letter No: F.No.39-434/2010 (SR)) for financial support of this major GPX6 research project work. “
“Nanotechnology can be defined as the design, synthesis, and application of materials and devices whose size and shape have been engineered at the nanoscale.1 It exploits

unique chemical, physical, electrical, and mechanical properties that emerge when matter is structured at the nanoscale. One of the most important aspects in nanotechnology relies on the synthesis of nanoparticles with well-defined sizes, shapes and controlled monodispersity. One of the major challenges of current nanotechnology is to develop reliable and non-toxic experimental protocols for the synthesis of nanoparticles with regards to non-toxic, clean and eco-friendly.2 Biotechnological route has emerged as a safe and alternative process in synthesis of nanoparticles by employing ambient biological resources. Perusal of studies reported by far express biological synthesis of nanoparticles from simple prokaryotic organism to multi cellular eukaryotes such as fungi and plants.3, 4, 5 and 6 The adaptation to heavy metal rich environments is resulting in microorganisms which express activities such as biosorption, bioprecipitation, extracellular sequestration, transport mechanisms, and chelation. Such resistance mechanism forms the basis for the use of microorganisms in production of nanoparticles.

Outcomes were measured at baseline, 13, and 65 weeks at physiothe

Outcomes were measured at baseline, 13, and 65 weeks at physiotherapy practices not involved in the trial by three trained research assistants

who were blinded to group allocation. Blinding was maintained by instructing participants not to talk about their intervention to the research assistants. Patients were included if they had osteoarthritis of the hip or knee according to the clinical find more criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (Altman et al 1986, Altman et al 1991) and were between 50 and 80 years of age. They were excluded if they had other pathology explaining the complaints; complaints in less than 10 out of 30 days; intervention for these complaints with exercise in the preceding six months; indication for hip or knee replacement within one year; contraindication for exercise; inability to understand the Dutch language; and a high level of physical functioning defined as < 2 on the walking ability and physical function sections of the Algofunctional

index (Faucher et al 2003, Lequesne et al 1987). They were recruited directly by the participating physiotherapists or in response to press releases in local newspapers (Veenhof et al 2005). Age, gender, height, weight, location of complaints, duration of complaints, and the presence of other chronic disorders were collected. X-rays of the hip and/or knee were scored by a rheumatologist according to the Kellgren Selleckchem Apoptosis Compound Library only and Lawrence scale; it consists of five levels where 0 = no osteoarthritis, 1 = doubtful osteoarthritis, 2 = minimal osteoarthritis, 3 = moderate osteoarthritis, and

4 = severe osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence 1957, Ravaud and Dougados 1997). Pain and physical functioning were measured with the WOMAC (Bellamy et al 1988). Physiotherapists working in primary care in the Utrecht region were included in the study. They were recruited using the NIVEL National Database of Primary Care Physiotherapists. A random sample of six hundred physiotherapists from Utrecht region was invited to participate. One hundred physiotherapists responded, of whom 87 (working in 72 practices) were willing and able to participate. The experimental group received a behavioural exercise program (see Appendix 1 on the eAddenda for details). The intervention was directed at a time-effective increase in the level of activities, with the goal of integrating these activities into daily living. The intervention also included individually-tailored exercises aimed at reducing any impairment limiting the performance of these activities. The complete protocol included written materials such as education messages, activity diaries, performance charts. The intervention consisted of a maximum of 18 sessions over a 12-week period, followed by five booster sessions in Week 18, 25, 34, 42, and 55. In Week 18 and 25, participants were allowed to receive 2 sessions.