2 to 5.5. This result supports an involvement of LCP proteins in a late step of WTA synthesis in S. aureus. As LCP proteins in B. subtilis are essential, it could be that the staphylococcal LCP triple mutant is only viable because of compensatory mutations, which remains to be verified. However, it is also possible that the functions of LCP proteins in S. aureus are not identical to those in B. subtilis, Trametinib clinical trial because differences
have been found in the WTA synthesis pathways of these closely related bacteria (Brown et al., 2010). Also, in contrast to S. aureus, WTA-deficient strains in B. subtilis have significantly decreased growth rates and lost their rod shape, indicating potential differences in the roles of WTA ligases in B. subtilis and S. aureus cell division (Weidenmaier et al., 2004; D’Elia et al., 2006). Measurement of CWSS expression in an S. aureus SA113ΔtarO (ΔtagO) mutant (Weidenmaier et al., 2004), with the reporter plasmid psas016p-luc+, revealed that inhibition of the first step of WTA synthesis induces the CWSS (Fig. 4b). This result is in conflict to the observations by Campbell et al., (2011) who showed that inhibition of TarO (TagO) by subinhibitory concentrations of tunicamycin
does not induce the CWSS. They suggested that CWSS induction is triggered by the sequestration of www.selleckchem.com/screening/anti-diabetic-compound-library.html the lipid carrier rather than WTA deficiency (Campbell et al., 2011, 2012). However, our analysis of the tarO (tagO) mutant indicates that further research is required to reveal the actual trigger of CWSS
induction. Deletion of LCP proteins increased basal expression levels of CWSS genes via the VraSR two-component system. The LCP triple mutant showed very high basal expression of the CWSS, close to levels triggered by antibiotic stress. The LCP double and single mutants, however, still responded to cell wall stress by further upregulating the CWSS. Promoter regions required for VraR-dependent induction of the LCP genes and sas016 shared low overall nucleotide similarity, but all contained fragments of the predicted CesR-like binding consensus or the VraR-binding motif of the vraSR operon and all were in close proximity to the −35 box of the gene’s promoter. Hyper susceptibility of the triple mutant to bacitracin, the virtual absence of WTA and partial restoration of WTA levels by complementation with each of the single LCP Urease proteins, as well partial complementation of its growth defect by TarO (TagO) inhibition, support the hypothesis that S. aureus LCP proteins have WTA ligase functions, as suggested by Kawai and colleagues for B. subtilis (Kawai et al., 2011). An enzymatic analysis of all three LCP proteins will be required to confirm their specific WTA ligase functions, substrates and products. We thank C. Weidenmaier for providing the tarO mutant strain. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 241446 (project ANTIRESDEV).