[51] evaluated the HpSA monoclonal EIA (Diagnostic Bioprobes Sri) in a series of 87 Turkish children, but they found its performance (Table 1) and a blood-based beta-catenin inhibitor serological test (H. pylori immunoglobulin G, HpIgG; Radim, Pomezia-Rome, Italy) to be poor compared with the UBT pre and posteradication. Calvet et al.
evaluated three monoclonal stool tests in 88 patients compared with breath test or histology at least 8 weeks posteradication treatment. The rapid in-office test RAPID Hp STAR (Oxoid Ltd.) and the laboratory-based Enzyme Immunoassay Amplified IDEIA HpStAR (Oxoid Ltd.) both had 100% sensitivity and therefore, can reliably indicate eradication; however, the ImmunoCard STAT1 HpSA (Meridian Diagnostics) had a lower sensitivity of 90%. All the tests had a specificity of over 92%, but all the tests gave some false positives post-treatment with quite low positive predictive values (62–69%)
[47]. Shimoyama et al. sought to evaluate the Premier Platinum HpSA Plus EIA (HpSA ELISA II; Meridian Diagnostics) which uses multiple monoclonal antibodies in Japanese patients post-H. pylori eradication [52]. They found this test could detect fewer numbers of check details H. pylori organisms in spiked fecal specimens than another stool antigen with a single monoclonal antibody (Testmate pylori antigen EIA; Wakamoto Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), but interestingly they found that both tests produced ten false negatives and the same negative predictive value. The Testmate produced more false positives (six compared with one), and therefore, the positive predictive value of the Premier Platinum was higher at 97% when it was recalculated (Table 1) [52]. The alkyl hydroperoxide reductase protein AhpC gene was amplified by Pourakbari et al. and used as the basis of a new stool antigen test.
This test had similar specificity and sensitivity to the other stool antigen tests (Table 1) [28]. Most of these diagnostic studies do not have sufficient numbers to give statistical power to determine 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 which test is superior. A meta-analysis of the results of the available studies post-treatment would help to determine which is the most accurate test in this clinical scenario. Fecal calprotectin was measured in patients with chronic gastritis and healthy volunteers but could not be identified as a marker of gastritis [53]. Only two studies evaluated H. pylori IgG-based kits. In a very large comparative study from the Zhuanghe region of North China, an area with high gastric cancer risk, Gong et al. compared serology (Hp-ELISA, Biohit Co, Finland) with histology in 7241 patients [54]. However, this serological kit from Finland was only positive in 42% of patients compared with 70% by histology, demonstrating the very important point that kits developed with H.