For each profession, the

noise levels were derived from the observed HTLs, using a maximum-likelihood fitting procedure in AZD6738 ic50 conjunction with the algorithm given in ISO-1999. A comparable approach is used more recently in a military population (Tufts et al. 2009). This way, hearing thresholds can be predicted for populations, even when noise exposure levels are not precisely known. The calculated noise level estimates are a result of all unknown aspects that may have influenced the workers’ noise exposure, such as HPD use, non-occupational noise exposure, individual susceptibility and other factors. Therefore, these predictions buy Berzosertib were verified by noise measurements in 1983, 1991, 2002 and 2007. These measurements are generated by Arbouw and include full-shift personal dosimetry and sound level measurements during specified job-related

tasks. Sound level measurements are combined logarithmically in order to calculate an 8-h equivalent noise level, using the duration and frequency of each task. The daily noise exposure levels obtained by dosimetry are arithmetically averaged to obtain job-specific exposure estimations. Table 1 provides an overview of the available data on noise exposure estimates for the twenty most prevalent jobs in the current dataset. Table 1 Noise exposure level estimates for the 20 most prevalent job titles, deriving from calculations and 10058-F4 purchase different noise measurements   Job title n Calculations Sound level measurement Dosimetry Intensity used 1 Carpenter 10,225 91   84–95 91 2 Bricklayer 2,394 91 87–92   91 3 Painter 2,082 88 80–90   88 4 Contractor 1,748 88 84–89   88 5 Hodman 635 90 80–90   87 6 Engineer (civil) 582 92   81–99 88 7 Navvy 518 91 81–95   91 8 Paver 508 91 86–93   92 9 Plasterer 412 90 85–108   93 10 Tiler

344 91 87–91   91 11 Crane operator 323 92 79–98   92 12 Driver/chauffeur 283 91     91 13 Mechanical woodworker 282 93 83–96 87–95 91 14 Concrete bender 237 89 82–89   89 15 Concrete Urease scraper 224 91 87–92   91 16 Mechanic (machines) 214 92 90–95   92 17 Pipelayer 200 91 85–95   91 18 Mechanic 192 92 82–96   92 19 Pile driver 145 96   80–103 86 20 Destructor 140 89   81–109 96 Noise exposure levels are expressed as equivalent 8-h, A-weighted sound-pressure levels (LA,eq(8h)), calculated using an exchange rate of 3 dB The results of the noise measurements showed good agreement with the noise level calculations for the majority of job titles (Table 1). In case of a deviation, the result of the noise measurements was considered the appropriate noise exposure level to be used in this study. Also, the different measurements performed in different periods showed great similarity. Exclusion criteria Of the 29,216 participants included in this study, all 951 female workers are discarded because of their concentration in non-noise-exposed jobs. Furthermore, one subject lacks all audiometric data and 173 participants show HTLs of 95 dB HL at one or more frequencies in both ears.